a few comments

Post Reply
Luca Tiberti
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2018 6:31 am

a few comments

Post by Luca Tiberti » Thu Sep 05, 2019 10:39 am

Dear Albert and team,
many thanks for your presentation. Here below a few comments:
- Regarding data, if you finally come up with accessing the second wave, how do you intend to use the two waves? in a pooled data setting?
- As for the identification of the non-farm participation effect, I believe that a more straightforward and, probably, convincing strategy, would a typical endogenous switching regression model, where the “regime” would be “being in non-farm sector” or not. As the exclusion restrictions, I am not sure that the proposed instruments could be a valid ones. For example, “access to market” seems to affect welfare (consumption) directly; also, the “intergenerational effects that influence non-farm participation” is unclear.
- The gender analysis looks too weak, as it does not seem to go beyond the control variable “gender”. A couple of options would be to look at the effects of non-farm participation by men and women separately; another option might be to estimate the non-farm participation effect on individual poverty (poverty is measured at the household level but methods developped in the collective modelling literature may help to estimate individual poverty).


Post Reply

Return to “PMMA-20395 - The impact of non-farm income on livelihoods in rural Zimbabwe: A gendered perspective”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest